December 25, 2025 – 5:31 AM
Last modified: December 26, 2025 – 2:52 AM by Acacia Eventide.
Acacia Eventide — Played by Kelly
Wanted
Wanna jump into the retconning waters with me in a character marriage together? I've gotten the green light to fully go forward, so here we go. Acacia's getting a bit of a retcon and I would like to inquire as to a spouse for her that isn't former/current nobility (and, ideally, not muggleborn because I want easier to connect in-laws on site either currently or potentially for mixed reactions to the recent marriage). Help please?
Looking for:
— Male-presenting character
— 30s-40s - pushing it for any younger or older but I'm flexible under the right circumstances
— Ideally the marriage would have happened in 1891, but dates are slightly flexible - i.e. not just married please <3
— I'm shooting for Upper Class because it goes with her muse still as a fish out of water still finding herself despite now being married (which she worried she would never obtain as a half-breed) and yet I am open to discussions of a MC husband for the right match
— I would prefer for the spouse to be married, but will happily settle for the in-laws to be the played character(s) with the spouse being open for adoption if possible
— Ideally, she will not be connected to another one of my characters xD
December 26, 2025 – 3:47 AM
I have no one that really fits the brief, even among my inactives. 1891 is just too far back for some. Others played connections are inactive which is less fun.
but no law against casting a net to make a new character married to her that have played relations, is there
December 26, 2025 – 3:53 AM
Acacia Eventide — Played by Kelly
(December 26, 2025 – 3:47 AM)Sun Choi Wrote: I have no one that really fits the brief, even among my inactives. 1891 is just too far back for some. Others played connections are inactive which is less fun. but no law against casting a net to make a new character married to her that have played relations, is there
I'd like to keep the courtship to marriage timeline somewhat solid, but can maybe go forward to 1892-1893 timeline-ish, being married in 1894 onward would too soon.
Did you have any connections in mind?
December 26, 2025 – 3:57 AM
(December 26, 2025 – 3:53 AM)Acacia Darlington Wrote: (December 26, 2025 – 3:47 AM)Sun Choi Wrote: I have no one that really fits the brief, even among my inactives. 1891 is just too far back for some. Others played connections are inactive which is less fun. but no law against casting a net to make a new character married to her that have played relations, is there
I'd like to keep the courtship to marriage timeline somewhat solid, but can maybe go forward to 1892-1893 timeline-ish, being married in 1894 onward would too soon.
Did you have any connections in mind?
dming you bc yes i do actually lol